Repro. Primed. Outer flange is bent down when it should be bent upward.
Ford Mustang and Shelby Years:
1964 1/2 (64 1/2), 1965 (65), 1966 (66), 1967 (67), 1968 (68), 1969 (69), 1970 (70)
Above years shown are used for searches and are not application listings.
Mercury Cougar Years:
1967 (67), 1968 (68), 1969 (69), 1970 (70)
Above years shown are used for searches and are not application listings.
NPD Part Number : 126-1ARH Manufacturer Reference #'s: FDM1043WR,
1965-1970 MUSTANG TRIM TO FIT 69-70
1967-1970 COUGAR TRIM TO FIT 69-70
WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including lead and DEHP, which are known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. For more information go to www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.
Like it states trim to fit but don't let that scare you as it's a good thing. Only thing i could suggest is if one is replacing the front floor board is to make sure everything fits together like it should before welding in place. You could end up with the wrong conture coming off the transmission tunnel.
Submitted on November 17, 2019 by Robert M.
Quality
Value
Good fit just a little on the thin side so dial in your welder before starting.
Submitted on December 13, 2019 by Michael E.
YES I would recommend this product.
Quality
Value
Awesome product, exactly as advertised
Submitted on February 20, 2021 by Roger W.
YES I would recommend this product.
Quality
Value
Poorly formed on the side that fits against the inner rocker panel. I cut off the outer 1 1/2 inch. I used my brake and shrinker/stretcher to form a new flange that correctly faces upward and welded it to the the rest of the panel.
Submitted on July 07, 2022 by William A.
Quality
Value
Receive my part quickly. Nice thick metal. Generous size...mine will need to be cut down to make it fit. Better than being too small.
Submitted on September 17, 2022 by Robert G.
YES I would recommend this product.
Quality
Value
Submitted on December 30, 2022 by Randy
YES I would recommend this product.
Quality
Value
Great price fast shipping.
Submitted on April 16, 2023 by Gregg B.
YES I would recommend this product.
Quality
Value
Nice fit, I wish it was bare or weld thru
Submitted on September 15, 2023 by Harry S.
YES I would recommend this product.
Quality
Value
Poor fitment and alot of fabrication required to make it useable
Submitted on July 29, 2024 by Thomas T.
YES I would recommend this product.
Quality
Value
Submitted on September 28, 2024 by Thomas T.
YES I would recommend this product.
Quality
Value